Tupelo was a Civil War engagement fought in Mississippi, 1864. It was a Union victory.
Maj. Gen. A.J. Smith, commanding a combined force of more than 14,000 men, left LaGrange, Tennessee, on July 5, 1864, and advanced south. Smith's mission was to insure that Maj. Gen. Nathan B. Forrest and his cavalry did not raid Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman's railroad lifeline in Middle Tennessee and, thereby, prevent supplies from reaching him in his campaign against Atlanta. Laying waste to the countryside as he advanced, Smith reached Pontotoc, Mississippi, on July 11. Forrest was in nearby Okolona with about 6,000 men, but his commander, Lt. Gen. Stephen D. Lee, told him he could not attack until he was reinforced. Two days later, Smith, fearing an ambush, moved east toward Tupelo. On the previous day, Lee arrived near Pontotoc with 2,000 additional men and, under his command, the entire Confederate force engaged Smith. Within two miles of the Federals, on the night of the 13th, Lee ordered an attack for the next morning. Lee attacked at 7:30 am the next morning in a number of uncoordinated assaults which the Yankees beat back, causing heavy casualties. Lee halted the fighting after a few hours. Short on rations, Smith did not pursue but started back to Memphis on the 15th. Criticized for not destroying Forrest's command, Smith had caused much damage and had fulfilled his mission of insuring Sherman's supply lines.
Fought on July 14 and 15, 1864, near Tupelo, Mississippi, this Civil War engagement is remembered under two names, Tupelo and Harrisburg alike. It began when Union forces marched south from Memphis, Tennessee, aiming to track down Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest and his Cavalry Corps, whose troops had routed a larger Union army the previous month at Brice's Cross Roads. When the two sides met near Tupelo on the fourteenth, the Confederates found themselves outnumbered yet chose to launch a frontal attack against well-fortified Union positions. Poor coordination plagued the assault, and Forrest's men paid dearly for it in casualties. Although his Cavalry Corps managed to survive the clash, the day ultimately belonged to Union General Andrew J. Smith, whose triumph at Tupelo helped safeguard Sherman's supply lines throughout the Atlanta campaign.
Someone once vowed to send troops after Forrest no matter the price, declaring a willingness to spend 10,000 lives and empty the Treasury, insisting that Tennessee would know no peace while Forrest still lived.
Once the Vicksburg Campaign of 1863 and the early 1864 Meridian campaign had run their course, Union commanders turned their focus toward the fighting unfolding in Virginia and Georgia. Sherman's push through Georgia hinged on keeping open the Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad, a supply artery running through Tennessee. That lifeline was endangered by the Confederate cavalry under Nathan Bedford Forrest, a commander who had already shown real skill at reinventing how horse soldiers fought. Forrest typically found himself facing larger numbers, yet he excelled at rapid, mobile campaigning, hitting weak points in supply networks and infrastructure while using bold, unsettling tactics to rattle enemies who outmatched him on paper.
A Union column moved into North Mississippi that June to confront him, only to suffer a decisive defeat at his hands on June 10 at Brice's Cross Roads. In response, Sherman called for a fresh campaign against Forrest's horsemen, placing Andrew Jackson Smith and Joseph A. Mower in command, with instructions to lure Forrest into a direct engagement and destroy him if the chance arose.
Having scouted the enemy camp under cover of darkness, Forrest judged the Union defenses too formidable and advised Lee to hold off attacking until the Federals broke camp and stretched out
A veteran brigade that fought on the 14th called the fighting the harshest and most costly it had ever faced, describing its casualties as without precedent in its prior service. This clash departed sharply from the pattern of Forrest's usual engagements, which relied on swift flanking movements and clever maneuvering rather than the direct assault by unmounted soldiers across exposed terrain that characterized this fight. Historians generally place responsibility for the overall approach on General Lee, who assumed command at Tupelo and crafted a flawed scheme that threw outnumbered attackers at an entrenched foe one brigade at a time. Yet Forrest himself had agreed to this plan before the fighting began, and he bears additional responsibility for neglecting to advance Roddey's brigade as intended, a lapse that left the Confederate center vulnerable to devastating Union fire.
Smith did not capitalize on the damage inflicted on the Confederate forces, allowing them to survive the engagement despite heavy losses. Looking back after the war, Lee suggested that a more capable commander could have turned the victory at Tupelo into a decisive blow against Forrest's corps. Instead, on the 15th Smith began withdrawing northward without having accomplished his goal of destroying Forrest's cavalry. Sherman, then advancing toward Atlanta, expressed frustration that Smith had failed to finish off Forrest, feeling the Confederate cavalry commander should never have been permitted to slip away. Although Forrest's command suffered severe casualties at Tupelo and lost numerous seasoned officers, it remained capable enough to launch a raid into Tennessee, strike Memphis in August, and later join Hood's campaign in Tennessee that fall.
This page covers Tupelo. A full Aubrey report for the area pulls together this battle alongside historic sites, land records, and everything else the record holds within a few miles:
Every location is different. Not every section appears for every place, only what the historical record actually holds turns up in a report.
The account on this page is written by Aubrey Research from cited sources. Wikipedia is cited as a reference; its text is not reproduced.
Aubrey generates in-depth historical research for any location in the US, drawing on NRHP records, battlefield archives, census history and geological data to tell the full story of a place.