A place in Sussex with a history you can trace through the records: its entry in the 1086 Domesday Book, the archaeological finds and scheduled monuments around it, and the nearest Roman sites and battlefields. Everything below is drawn from the historical record.
In 1086, Portslade was held by Osward (of Norton).
When William the Conqueror's commissioners surveyed Portslade in 1086, they recorded 2 manors held by Osward (of Norton) and Albert, under William of Warenne. Before the Conquest, in the time of King Edward, the land was held by Osward (of Norton).
The settlement was assessed at 1 hide for tax. The record notes 0.5 plough teams at work. The recorded population was 2 heads of household: 2 villagers. These are heads of household, so the settlement's true population was several times larger. The manors were valued at 12 shillings in 1086, up from 6 shillings in 1066.
The Domesday Book was the great survey of England ordered by William the Conqueror in 1085 and completed in 1086, the oldest surviving public record in the country. How the survey worked →
Portslade was one of the settlements recorded in Sussex in the 1086 survey. Sussex in the Domesday survey →
This page is just one thread. A full Aubrey report pulls together 15 strands of Portslade's history, each drawn from the record and mapped to the exact spot:
Every location is different. Not every section appears for every place, only what the historical record actually holds turns up in a report.
Nationally registered historic battlefields within 25 miles of Portslade.
145 recorded finds have been logged within about 5 miles of Portslade, reported by members of the public and entered in the national record of archaeological finds. They span these periods:
The bedrock beneath Portslade is White Chalk Subgroup (Maastrichtian).
Aubrey's full report for this location includes every Domesday manor, the complete record of medieval lordship, archaeological context, and the story of how this settlement evolved from 1086 to the present day.